Welcome to the Economic Statecraft Program

The Bush School’s Economic Statecraft Program is a novel effort that seeks to analyze economic statecraft, bring together academics across the world, and serve as a linkage between policymakers and academia. It is led by Dr. William J. Norris, an Associate Professor at the Bush School, who also directs the China Studies concentration.

The Program conducts academic and policy-oriented research on economic statecraft and hosts events like the Economic Statecraft Conference, an innovative venue in Washington, DC, facilitating dialogue between academia and practitioners. The Economic Statecraft Program prides itself on drawing together various approaches to economic statecraft within the international relations tradition to provide a rigorous and fruitful analysis of the phenomenon’s history, its contemporary manifestations, and future avenues for innovative theoretical and empirical research.

Students at the Bush School have the opportunity of taking graduate coursework on China, grand strategy, economics, and political science. In addition, they are encouraged to take courses from Texas A&M University’s graduate business and law schools.

What is Economic Statecraft?

Defining Economic Statecraft
Defining Economic Statecraft

Number 1

Commercial actors (not states) conduct the vast majority of international economics.


Number 2

These interactions may carry important implications for states’ strategic security (Security Externalities).


Number 3

States can manipulate the incentives of commercial actors in order to encourage (or discourage) particular patterns of behavior that generate security externalities that are conducive to the state’s strategic interests.

Such manipulation is defined as Economic Statecraft.

How Does Economic Statecraft Work?
A flowchart diagram illustrating types of economic interaction. The chart starts with a box labeled "Economic Interaction," branching into two: "Economic Channel" and "Military Channel." Under "Economic Channel," it splits into "Economy as Means" (which further leads to two types: "Transactional: Forcing change in state behavior" and "Transformational: Engendering change in definition of state interests") and "Economy as Ends" (leading to "Corrosive: Weakening the national economy" and "Bolstering: Strengthening the national economy"). Under "Military Channel," it splits into "Disarming: Weakening military capability" and "Arming: Strengthening military capability." The chart uses blue boxes for main categories and maroon boxes for descriptions.

The subject of the economics-security nexus, or “economic statecraft,” asks security-oriented questions that economists tend not to consider, while at the same time requiring economic intuition and analytic toolkits that most security specialists do not possess. Economic statecraft, as we think about it, is the intentional attempt of a state to deliberately incentivize commercial actors to act in a manner that generates security externalities conducive to the state’s strategic interests. Organizing the intellectual space of economic statecraft along the lines of security externalities categorized on the basis of their effects on a target (rather than by the particular tools such as sanctions or export controls) can be more useful for the policy process.

This framework also provides a specific vocabulary clarifying precisely what a state is worried about and/or how a sender is thinking about its strategy to achieve its objectives using economic tools of national power. Broadly speaking, there are two channels via which economic interaction can impact a nation’s security: Military and Economic. Those externalities acting via the Military Channel share the common causal logic that a nation’s direct war-fighting capacity can be directly strengthened or weakened by economic statecraft. Similarly, we can think about strengthening or weakening a nation’s economy to affect a state’s security. For this family of externalities, security ramifications are often the second-order consequences of the economic interaction (as opposed to the military affects branch of the typology in which the economic interaction directly contributes or detracts from a state’s ability to wage war).

The economic branch is further subdivided into two groups: 1.) the types of externalities that affect the overall health of the target economy as an end in itself and 2.) those security externalities in which the economic interaction plays an instrumental rather than teleological role. In the “Economy as Means” group, the economic interaction may be primarily transactional (e.g. sanctions, freezing bank accounts, etc.) to alter the target’s behavior or to actually transform the goals and interests of the target.

By focusing on the terminal nodes of the typology, we are left with six distinct types of security externalities which cover the full range of possible security externality categories.

Framing Economic Statecraft
A Venn diagram with three overlapping colored circles representing key themes in international economic power and defense. The yellow circle is labeled "Economic Foundations of Military Might" with examples of theorists listed below (e.g., Smith, Hamilton, List, Kennedy, Grieco). The pink circle is labeled "Political Economy of Defense" with examples of theorists (e.g., Halperin, Milward, Javits, Gansler). The blue circle is labeled "Economics & Likelihood of Conflict" with examples of theorists (e.g., Cobden, Angell, Polachek, Oneal, Copeland, Haas, Mitrany, Deutsch). Where yellow and pink overlap: "Industrial Mobilization & Wartime Economics." Where yellow and blue overlap: "Strategic Goods & Sensitive Trade." Where pink and blue overlap: "Leninist Imperialism." The center where all three circles overlap: "Nature, Causes & Exercise of International Economic Power."

The study of Economic Statecraft resides at the intersection of a number of academic literatures that bridge between economics and security. These literatures are organized by areas of overlap as depicted in the diagram above. Economic Statecraft involves the nature, causes, and application of economic power.

Mission | Economic Statecraft Program

The Economic Statecraft Program (ESP) is an academic research program that serves as both a nexus and a catalyst for advancing foundational and cutting edge work in the area of economic statecraft.

  • ENGAGEMENT – Acts as an intermediary nexus convening across US government actors, academics, commercial entities to advance practice and understanding at the intersection of economics and security.
  • SCHOLARSHIP – An active catalyst designed to advance the state-of-the-art understanding of the economic tools of national power.
  • POLICY – A force multiplier in economic statecraft through direct collaboration in the design, education, and implementation of sustainable U.S. economic statecraft strategy and policy.

Meet the Team | Economic Statecraft Program

william norris image

William Norris

Associate Professor of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy Program Director

wjnorris@tamu.edu

View Profile
Sarah Mesich headshot

Sarah

Mesich Project Coordinator
View Profile
Fritz Bartel Headshot

Dr. Fritz Bartel

Affiliated Faculty
View Profile