THE ONLINE CHRONICLE OF NEWS AT THE BUSH SCHOOL



Is NAFTA Really the Disaster Trump Thinks It Is? Texas A&M Prof Takes Objective Look

January 09, 2017

Image of the word NAFTA and pillars supporting it

 

Free trade is being blamed for a lot of the world’s woes, but is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) really the “worst trade agreement ever” as President-elect Trump has stated? In an article titled “The NAFTA Intellect Disconnect: Actual Costs and Benefits versus Popular Perceptions,” published by the Mosbacher Institute for Trade, Economics, and Public Policy in the most recent issue of The Takeaway, Texas A&M University Professor Raymond Robertson revisits the evidence surrounding NAFTA, in particular, and free trade agreements, in general.

Robertson, a professor of economics and government at the Bush School of Government and Public Service, begins by noting that if NAFTA is judged by its stated goals, it has been very successful. He writes, “It is clear that since NAFTA, trade and investment have significantly increased between the three NAFTA countries. In particular, goods traded between Mexico and the United States increased by more than a factor of five between 1994 and 2015.”

He also addresses whether the United States benefits from trade agreements like NAFTA, acknowledging that imports have been associated with job losses in some hard-hit areas and industries, and says that exports are unambiguously associated with job gains. Furthermore, he states that “the most accurate way to think of the NAFTA economic area is as one integrated economy rather than three separate ones.” Robertson argues that rather than thinking of Mexico as a competitor, it should be considered a partner in the United States’ national production process–where Mexican and US workers are complements, and not substitutes, in production.

Robertson finds that overall, NAFTA’s effects have been small but positive for both Mexico and the United States and that the number of workers who have been adversely affected is in the thousands, while the number of people who benefit from trade runs in the millions. He concludes that “free trade agreements are a proven way to improve economic conditions for both the United States and our trading partners.”

The full article can be found at http://bush.tamu.edu/mosbacher/takeaway.

[Return to homepage]


Tags: Faculty / News / Research /

Follow us!





In the Media

November 28, 2017: "Focus at Four: GOP moves closer to tax reform" KBTX

November 28, 2017: "OPEC Leader Cites ‘New Optimism’ With Oil Prices on the Rise" The New York Times

November 23, 2017: "Nafta Talks Have High Stakes for Two Texas Bridge Owners" The New York Times

November 21, 2017: "Symposium at Texas A&M explores link between women's rights, national security" The Eagle

November 16, 2017: "Chief negotiator defends NAFTA during panel discussion at Texas A&M" The Eagle

Additional Media


Lastest Bush School News

Bush School Students Finalists in World’s Largest Cyber Security Law & Policy Challenge

Leading Force of Good

Bush School provides important “human dimensions” in new PATHS-UP Center

Panelists Discuss the Iran Nuclear Agreement in “What’s Next?” Series

“Friendsgiving” Event Sponsored by Bush School Diversity and Inclusion Committee

Respect, Not Just a State of Mind

Bush School Students Honor Veterans’ Service with Letter Campaign